Skip to content
ProofSprint · Fictional example · 2 October 2026

Inspect the work behind the offer.

Inspect a worked example: 20 buyer questions, eight fictional source documents, a traceable response matrix, an implementation summary and an evidence-gap register. Click a citation to inspect the exact excerpt. This example demonstrates our method; it is not a client result or evidence of measured savings.

Fictional demonstration

All product documents, requirements and numbers are invented for this example. No real client approval, certification, measured saving or sales result is claimed.

Fictional vendor AtlasFlow responds to a fictional manufacturer’s enterprise procurement questionnaire. Neither party is a client.

Public page with no access control: it contains no confidential information and is not a secure room for client documents.

Response matrixBack to the ProofSprint offer

Overview

From scattered documents to a reviewable dossier

  • 12

    Supported by fictional source

  • 5

    Expert review required

  • 3

    Evidence missing

Before

Eight disconnected documents; draft objectives mixed with commitments; missing certificates.

After

Twenty traceable answers; explicit limitations; an implementation summary and assigned review actions.

What remains unproven

Product compliance, actual time saved, client approval and commercial return.

01Response matrix

Response matrix

20 questions mapped to eight documents. “Supported” means the answer is supported by this fictional text; it does not mean a real expert has approved it. Negative answers remain visible.

Download the matrix (CSV)
Evidence status

20 questions shown

Response matrix of the fictional demonstration
IDBuyer questionProposed answerSource and status
Q01Approval workflows?Configurable approval workflows are described for Enterprise.
S01Supported by fictional source
Q02Role-based permissions?An administrator assigns workspace roles.
S01Supported by fictional source
Q03SAML SSO included?SAML 2.0 is included in Enterprise.
S02Supported by fictional source
Q04SCIM provisioning?No. The specification explicitly says SCIM is not supported.
S02Supported by fictional source
Q05Primary hosting location?Application and primary database: France.
S03Supported by fictional source
Q06Backup location?Germany. Do not describe all storage as France-only.
S03Supported by fictional source
Q07JSON export?The REST API exports records as JSON.
S05Supported by fictional source
Q08CSV export?An administrator can download a CSV export.
S05Supported by fictional source
Q09Pilot timeline?Four-week estimate after approved inputs and access; not an unconditional delivery guarantee.
S06Supported by fictional source
Q10Customer resources?A project sponsor and identity administrator are required.
S06Supported by fictional source
Q11Historical migration included?No. Historical migration is excluded from the estimate.
S06Supported by fictional source
Q1224/7 support included?No. The schedule states weekday business-hours support.
S07Supported by fictional source
Q13All processing exclusively in France?No such conclusion is supported: backups are in Germany and support/subprocessor locations need review.
S03Expert review required
Q14Recovery time commitment?Eight-hour objective is proposed, not a tested or contractual commitment.
S04Expert review required
Q15Recovery point commitment?Twenty-four-hour objective is proposed; test evidence and contract confirmation are required.
S04Expert review required
Q16Deletion within thirty days guaranteed?Draft only. Legal exceptions and backup deletion are unresolved.
S08Expert review required
Q17Year-one total price approved?Illustrative total: EUR 60,000. Commercial owner must confirm taxes, scope and binding price.
S07Expert review required
Q18ISO 27001 certificate?No certificate supplied. Do not claim certification.
No source suppliedEvidence missing
Q19Independent penetration-test report?No report supplied. Obtain an approved report and permitted sharing terms.
No source suppliedEvidence missing
Q20Production SAP integration?No connector or implementation evidence supplied. An API alone does not prove an integration.
No source suppliedEvidence missing

02Original sources

Original sources

Every citation leads to the exact excerpt and section. These are authored fictional inputs, not third-party evidence about a real product.

Download the sources (TXT)
  • S01Product specification§1.1
    The Enterprise plan supports configurable approval workflows and role-based permissions. A workspace administrator assigns roles.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S02Identity specification§2.1
    SAML 2.0 single sign-on is included in Enterprise. SCIM provisioning is not currently supported.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S03Hosting architecture§3.1
    Production application and primary database are hosted in France. Backups are stored in Germany. The architecture document does not establish the locations of support access or all subprocessors.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S04Operational resilience draft§4.1
    The proposed recovery time objective is eight hours and recovery point objective is twenty-four hours. These objectives have not been demonstrated in a documented recovery test.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S05API guide§5.1
    The REST API exports records as JSON. An administrator can download a CSV export. The guide does not describe a production SAP connector.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S06Implementation estimate§6.1
    A pilot is estimated at four weeks after approved inputs and access are received. The customer supplies a project sponsor and an identity administrator. Historical data migration is excluded from this estimate.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S07Commercial schedule§7.1
    The illustrative software subscription is EUR 48,000 annually and implementation is EUR 12,000 once. Support is available Monday to Friday, 09:00–18:00 Paris time, excluding public holidays. No twenty-four-hour support is included.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix
  • S08Retention policy draft§8.1
    The draft proposes deletion within thirty days of contract termination. Legal retention exceptions and the backup deletion schedule remain to be confirmed.

    Fictional source. No real owner approval obtained.

    Back to the matrix

03Buyer room overview

Buyer room overview

  • Fit

    Enterprise workflows and SAML SSO are described. SCIM and 24/7 support are not included.

  • Evidence

    Twelve answers supported; five need review; three lack evidence. No certification claim is released.

  • Implementation

    Four-week pilot estimate; customer sponsor and identity administrator; historical migration excluded.

  • Economics

    Software year-one illustrative cost: €60,000. Buyer benefit baseline missing; buyer ROI cannot yet be calculated.

  • Open questions

    Recovery tests, deletion exceptions, subprocessors, certificates and SAP evidence remain unresolved.

  • Decision

    No recommendation to sign until the buyer’s mandatory requirements and relevant expert approvals are resolved.

04Implementation and open questions

Implementation and open questions

Pilot dependencies

Vendor: configure workspace and SAML. Customer: approve pilot scope, provide identity administrator and a test dataset. Joint: agree success criteria before launch. Four weeks is an input estimate, not a ProofSprint delivery promise.

  • Q13 · All processing exclusively in France?

    Expert review required

    No such conclusion is supported: backups are in Germany and support/subprocessor locations need review.

  • Q14 · Recovery time commitment?

    Expert review required

    Eight-hour objective is proposed, not a tested or contractual commitment.

  • Q15 · Recovery point commitment?

    Expert review required

    Twenty-four-hour objective is proposed; test evidence and contract confirmation are required.

  • Q16 · Deletion within thirty days guaranteed?

    Expert review required

    Draft only. Legal exceptions and backup deletion are unresolved.

  • Q17 · Year-one total price approved?

    Expert review required

    Illustrative total: EUR 60,000. Commercial owner must confirm taxes, scope and binding price.

  • Q18 · ISO 27001 certificate?

    Evidence missing

    No certificate supplied. Do not claim certification.

  • Q19 · Independent penetration-test report?

    Evidence missing

    No report supplied. Obtain an approved report and permitted sharing terms.

  • Q20 · Production SAP integration?

    Evidence missing

    No connector or implementation evidence supplied. An API alone does not prove an integration.

Required owner: security/privacy expert for Q13–16 and Q18–19; commercial owner for Q17; integration lead for Q20. Due dates must be agreed with the real client.

05Is the service economically worthwhile?

Is the service economically worthwhile?

This calculator evaluates possible proposal-preparation capacity released by ProofSprint. It is separate from the fictional software’s buyer ROI, for which no benefit baseline has been provided. All inputs below are assumptions.

Your assumptions

Capacity value = hours × hourly cost × attributable share. Net value = capacity value − €12,500 service fee.

Illustrative capacity value

€9,000

Net illustrative value: -€3,500

Break-even: 83.3 genuinely avoided hours.

Interpretation

On these assumptions, capacity value alone does not cover the fee.

Released staff time is not automatically cash saved. No increased win rate or deal revenue is included. Avoid counting the same benefit twice.

06Release and acceptance checklist

Release and acceptance checklist

  • Account for every buyer question and preserve negative answers.
  • Have authorized experts verify source currency, relevance and each proposed claim; record their real sign-off.
  • Resolve mandatory gaps or explicitly agree their exclusion. No source-backed answer is automatically client-approved.
  • Agree secure source transfer, hosting, permissions and confidential-material handling before real work. This public sample has no access control.
  • Obtain express client acceptance of the agreed deliverables. This sample has no client acceptance or revenue.

And for your deal?

An example does not validate a price.

This example proves that a concrete dossier can be assembled and inspected. It does not prove that €12,500 is market-validated or worthwhile for your project. Confirm scope, actual workload, expert access and economic fit before agreeing a price.

This website shows the example in English and French; a standard ProofSprint is delivered in one language.

Discuss your dealBack to the ProofSprint offer

contact@amyn.agency

AMYN · Synthetic sample only · No confidential client material · Client sign-off required before any real buyer release.